Preventive Legislations ML/FT - Major Countries/Regions : Selected Nations
The AML/CFT framework of some of the nations are given below to impress upon readers that the job is on in different countries with enthusiasm and focus, apart from those major nations/regions covered in other related posts.
Japan
Japan is a member of FATF from 1990. Based on the revisions of the FATF 40 Recommendations in 2003, Japan enforced the ‘Act on Prevention of Transfer of Criminal Proceeds’ in 2007. The act has been amended on 28 April 2011 effective from 1 April 2013. Several other laws implemented for AntiMoney Laundering measures include the following:
a) Anti-Drug
Special Prevention Law (1992)
b) Act on the
Punishment of Organized Crime (2000).
Customer
identification and verification for a variety of occasional transactions above
the designated threshold of JPY 2,000,000 is required under Article 8,
paragraph 1 (i) (p) of the Order for Enforcement of the Act. The threshold is
lowered to JPY 100,000 for wire transfers. The listing of occasional
transactions covered by this provision is comprehensive and includes
transactions “for receiving and paying cash, a check to bearer, cashier’s check
or a certificate or coupon of a public or corporate bearer bond” as well as the
exchange of Japanese or foreign currencies and the purchase or sale of
traveler’s checks. Specified Business Operators are required to verify a
natural person’s name and domiciliary address and date of birth by reviewing
the customer’s driver’s license or by “any other method specified by an
ordinance of the competent ministries.” Specified Business Operators are
required to verify the name and location of the head or main office of a legal
person using a certificate of registered matters, seal registration certificate
or any other document issued by a “public agency” which includes this information.
Amendment of the Act on Prevention of Transfer
of Criminal Proceeds
The government has repeatedly considered
working on the flaws pointed out by the Third FATF Mutual Evaluation conducted
on Japan between 2007 and 2008. As for the recommendation regarding customer
due diligence, various discussions were made in the meeting of business
operators on customer due diligence for measures against money laundering,
which was participated by experts and business people and was established in
the National Police Agencyin January 2010. The results of the discussions were
subsequently reported in July of the same year. Meanwhile, a close look at the
damage of Furikome Fraud that remains at a high level reveals the frequent use
of call forwarding service providers (described later) in the crimes and
ongoing issues of illicit transfers of savings passbooks as tools for such
crimes. Taking into account the abovementioned report and recent trends in the
damage of Furikome Fraud and other crimes in the country, a bill on amendments
to the Act on Prevention of Transfer of Criminal Proceeds was submitted to the
177th session of the Diet in April 2011, and a law for the amendment of the Act
on Prevention of Transfer of Criminal Proceeds was enacted on the 27th of the same
month, which was promulgated on the following 28th. It was fully enforced on
1st April 2013.
New Zealand
The Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism Act 2009 (AML/CFT
Act) places obligations on New Zealand’s financial institutions, casinos,
virtual assets service providers, accountants, lawyers, conveyancers and high
value dealers to detect and deter money laundering and terrorism
financing.
The Act
ensures that businesses take appropriate measures to guard against money
laundering and terrorism financing. This enhances the reputation of individual
businesses, and of New Zealand as a safe place in which to do business.
The Act came into full force on 30 June 2013.
Section 5 of the Act require
the business need:
·
Risk Assessment of the money laundering and financing of terrorism
that you could expect in the course of running your business
·
An AML/CFT Programme that
includes procedures to detect, deter, manage and mitigate money laundering and
the financing of terrorism
·
A Compliance Officer appointed
to administer and maintain your AML/CFT programme
·
Customer Due Diligence processes including customer identification and
verification of identity
·
Suspicious Activity Reporting,
Auditing and Annual Reporting systems
and processes.
On December 7 2021, the Financial Markets Authority (FMA) released a new report, the ‘Anti Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism Sector Risk Assessment 2021’ (Sector Risk Assessment). The Sector Risk Assessment evaluates the money laundering and terrorism financing (ML/TF) risks posed specifically to the sectors supervised by the FMA, and updates and replaces the Sector Risk Assessment previously issued in 2017.
The FMA supervises reporting entities in ten sectors under the AML/CFT Act. Each of the ten sectors is assigned a risk rating, which is an assessment of the inherent risks of ML/TF in that sector, that ranges from Low, to Medium-Low, to Medium-High, to High.The FMA has also clarified that the details contained in the National Risk Assessment 2019 have not influenced the risk rating classification for any of the sectors supervised by them.
The FMA has, however, included
Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) in its Sector Risk Assessment
for the very first time. Nevertheless, as the FMA supervises only a very
limited number of VASPs (with the Department of Internal Affairs(DIA) being the primary supervisor), they have
largely deferred to the risk rating promulgated by the DIA (who have classified
the ML/TF risks associated with VASPs as high), in their Sector Risk
Assessment. The FMA notes for instance that “We expect all REs to familiarise
themselves with the risks and vulnerabilities associated with VASPs and virtual
assets, and incorporate this into your risk assessments where appropriate. At a
minimum, REs should closely read the DIA’s sector risk assessment and guidanceon VASPs”.
Australia
Tranche 2 reforms
Australia is expected to introduce Tranche 2 reforms in 2024/2025 to avoid getting added to the
FATF grey list. The Attorney General announced a consultation on AML/CFT
reforms and indicated that the government had accepted recommendations included
in the Senate’s Inquiry into
the adequacy and efficacy of Australia’s anti-money laundering and
counter-terrorism financing regime.
Tranche 2 reforms have long been a point of contention in Australia. The
Senate report included an overview of the regulation of Tranche 2 entities, current
and emerging challenges in AML, and various recommendations for improvement.
Tranche 2 entities include lawyers, real estate agents, casinos, other gambling
service providers, auditors, and precious metal and stone dealers.
Recommendations
include introducing gatekeeper regulation and improving the AML/CFT framework.
It also advises simplifying AML/CFT rules, supporting the use of technologies
to meet know your customer (KYC) obligations, applying a risk-based approach to
regulation, pursuing a beneficial ownership register, increasing penalties for
money laundering and terrorist financing, and boosting resourcing in AUSTRAC.
The Australian government committed AUS$14.3 million over
four years to support necessary legislative and regulatory reforms.
China
China's KYC regulations are governed by the People's
Bank of China and the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission.
Financial institutions must conduct due diligence on their customers, and the
government strictly monitors large transactions and suspicious activities.
Mobile payments and digital identity verification have become integral parts of
KYC practices in the country.
The
primary legislation governing AML in China as follows:
a) Anti-money
Laundering Law (2006)
b) Provisions on
Anti-money Laundering through Financial Institutions (2006)
c) Administrative
Measures for Financial Institutions on Report of Large-sum Transactions and
Doubtful Transactions (2006)
d) Administrative
Measures for Financial Institutions on Report of Transactions Suspected of
Financing for Terrorist Purposes (2007)
e) Administrative
Measures for Financial Institutions on Identification of Client Identity and
Preservation of Client Identity Materials and Transactions Records (2007).
China is a Member of FATF from 2007.
Since the 2019 Mutual Evaluation by FATF of the effectiveness of China's measures to combat money laundering and terrorist financing, the country reported back to the FATF in 2020 and 2021 on the actions taken to strengthen its AML/CFT framework. As a result of this report, the FATF rerated the Country on a number of the 40 Recommendations.
Today(2021),
China is compliant on 9 of the 40 Recommendations and largely compliant on 22of them. It remains partially compliant on 3 Recommendations and non-compliant
on 6 Recommendations.
Hong Kong
As an
international financial centre, Hong Kong attaches great importance to
safeguarding the integrity of our financial systems by implementing
international standards on anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist
financing (“AML/CTF”) to deter and detect inward and outward flows of illicit
funds.
Hong Kong has
sectoral regulatory bodies that oversee anti-money laundering and
counter-terrorism financing (AML/CFT) efforts, including the Financial Services
and the Treasury Bureau (FSTB), the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA), and the Securities and
Futures Commission (SFC)
In February 2023,
the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) published revised guidance relating to transaction monitoring, screening,
and suspicious transaction reporting. The guidance underscored the regulator’s
aim for authorized institutions to adopt a system that generates targeted
alerts to deliver more actionable insights.
In Hong Kong, money
laundering is a serious offence and is regulated primarily under the money
laundering and terrorism financing laws are primarily governed by the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing
(Financial Institutions) Ordinance (AMLO) and its associated regulations. These laws aim to prevent and
detect money laundering, terrorist financing, and other financial crimes by
imposing obligations on certain entities who are required to establish clear
and comprehensive AML policies that outline their commitment to combating money
laundering and terrorism financing
The key obligations under the AMLOinclude:
- Customer
due diligence (CDD) - these are measures to verify the identity
of their customers and includes obtaining and verifying customer
identification documents and assessing the risk associated with each
customer.
- Reporting
of suspicious transactions - where entities are obligated
to report any suspicious transactions or activities that may be related to
money laundering or terrorist financing to the Joint
Financial Intelligence Unit (JFIU)
- Transaction
and cross-border reporting - where entities are required
to report certain types of financial transactions, such as cash
transactions over a specified threshold and cross-border movement of
physical currency or bearer negotiable instruments.
- Compliance
programs -
where entities must establish and maintain comprehensive AML/CFT
compliance programs including enterprise-wide ML/TF risk assessments,
internal policies and procedures, staff training, and ongoing monitoring
to ensure compliance with the law.
- Record-keeping - where
entities must maintain adequate records of customer identification,
transactions, and business relationships and retain them for periods
specified within the regulations.
Pakisthan
Pakistan's
anti-money laundering laws consist of Anti-Money Laundering Ordinance, 2007 and
Anti-Money Laundering Regulations 2008. The Anti-Terrorism Act of 2002 defines
the crimes of terrorist finance and money laundering and establishes
jurisdictions and punishments. The National Accountability Ordinance of 1999,
which requires financial institutions to report suspicious transactions to the
NAB and establishes accountability courts; and The Control of Narcotic
Substances Act of 1997, which also requires the reporting of suspicious
transactions to the ANF, contains provisions for the freezing and seizing of
assets associated with narcotics trafficking, and establishes special courts
for offenses (including financing) involving illegal narcotics. All these laws
include provisions to allow investigators to access financial records and
conduct financial investigations. The Anti-Money Laundering Act, provides for
the prevention of money laundering (AML) and combating financing of terrorism
(CFT) in Pakistan. Among other provisions, the act:
·
Establishes
a National Executive Committee to make high-level decisions on AML/CFT matters;
·
Establishes
a Financial Monitoring Unit (FMU) to receive and analyze reports of suspicious
transactions, assist in investigations, recommend changes to regulations, and
generally exercise responsibility for AML/CFT; and
·
Provides
directions on investigation, search and seizure of property
Pakistanhas a strong and robust Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of
Terrorism (AML/CFT) framework. It is
compliant/largely compliant with 38 out of 40 Financial
Action Task Force (FATF) Recommendations, which places Pakistan in the
top tier of countries.
The G-7 Initiative
AI regulations
In October 2023, the G7 issued a Statement on the Hiroshima AI Process, announcing the Hiroshima Process International Guiding Principles for Organizations Developing Advanced AI Systems and the Hiroshima Process International Code of Conduct for Organizations Developing Advanced AI Systems to address identified priorities. In November, the United Kingdom brought together government and technology leaders with twenty-eight governments, including the UK, US, EU, Australia, and China, aggregating to the Bletchley Declaration on AI safety. The declaration highlights the need for international cooperation to address risks associated with AI to harness the “transformative positive potential of AI” while ensuring the development of human-centric, trustworthy, and responsible AI. Companies also agreed to test new models with governments before they are released to manage risks.
Crucially for AML/CFT professionals, regulators, and policymakers are beginning to sketch out how AI could be regulated nationally. Legislative proposals are at various stages of development across – amongst others – the EU, US, Canada, and UK, with more codified requirements likely to be published through 2024.
Happy Reading
Readers who read this, also read:
1. Preventive Legislations ML/FT - Major Countries/Regions : USA
2. Preventive Legislations ML/FT - Major Countries/Regions : UK
3. Preventive Legislations ML/FT - Major Countries/Regions : Europe(EU)
4. Preventive Legislations ML/FT - Major Countries/Regions : India
Comments
Post a Comment